跳到正文
Steven Pinker· @sapinker · X·· 4 天前AI 评分20
内容导读

平克在与Henry Shevlin、Dan Williams的讨论中认为,把AI拟人化并不成立:人类的残忍、浪费与竞争等适应不良后果源于自然选择没有设计者,而AI是“智能设计”的产物。他主张工程师可以明确设定要优化的目标、要最小化的副作用和绝不允许的行为;若让AI在无人类干预下自行演化,才会构成风险。

正文 · 原文

Henry Shevlin (@dioscuri), Dan Williams (@danwilliamsphil), and I discuss AI and "superintelligence."

You get all of these maladaptive outcomes—all this cruelty and waste and competition and aggression—precisely because there was no designer who wanted to minimize any of these things. Natural selection did its thing.

If AI were simply allowed to evolve without any kind of human intervention, then that would be a risk. But in the case of AI, there is intelligent design. I mean, us. These are gadgets. I think it’s illicit to anthropomorphize AI as being like human beings, which are products of natural selection, when AIs are not products of natural selection. They’re products of intelligent design.

And so the engineers can think, “Well, these are the goals that we want to optimize. These are the kinds of side effects that we want to minimize. These are the kinds of things that we wouldn’t in a million years allow it to do.”

来源:Steven Pinker · x.com